
AFRICA SPACE SCIENCE AWARD COMMITTEE
Committee Members (2022-2023)
Name |
Institution |
Committee Role |
Anthea Coster |
MIT Haystack Observatory |
Committee chair |
Timothy Goudge |
University of Texas at Austin |
Member |
Anthony Okiwelu | University of Calabar | Member |
Committee charge
The committee is charged with selecting the recipients of the Africa Award for Research Excellence in Space Science. Committee members will abide by AGU’s Honors Conflict of Interest Policy, program policies, procedures and guidelines set by AGU. In partnership with the Honors and Recognition Committee and staff, the committee works to ensure that the program is superior in all respects, recognizes all constituents, and fosters a global network of individuals in the Earth and space sciences who epitomize excellence and cooperation in research, education and outreach. The members of the Africa Award Committee will promote excellence and transparency, allowing broad input and recognition beyond disciplinary awards, promoting diversity and equity so that the Africa Award is sufficiently representative of underrepresented groups.

Key initiatives
The committee supports the following initiatives and duties. Their work is completed primarily through the online submission and review system, by teleconference and email.
-
1Review data from past selection processes to determine if the program is aligned with AGU’s goals
-
2Examine and report on program data to determine whether the number and quality of nominations are competitive
-
3Select the Africa Award for Research Excellence Space Science recipient
-
4Recommend, implement, and evaluate strategies used to increase diversity of nominees and nominations
-
5Participate in training, orientations and workshops on associated policies and procedures
-
6Understand and commit to AGU’s Conflict of Interest policy and process
-
7Provide input and recommendations to the Honors and Recognition Committee on program improvements
-
8Partner with AGU leaders, staff and other societies to resolve common issues among scientific communities’ rewards and recognition programs