Rocky ocean with foam at sunset

CESARE EMILIANI LECTURE COMMITTEE

Committee members

Name

Institution

Committee Role
Kathleen Johnson  University of California Irvine 

Committee Chair
Jennifer Fehrenbacher Oregon State University 

Committee Chair
Baerbel Hoenisch Columbia University 

Member
Matthew Huber  Purdue University 

Member
Aaron Putnam

Member
Ursula Roehl 20twenty Strategic Consulting 

Member

Rosa Maymi 

AGU

Staff Partner; Director,  Engagement, and Membership

Brendon Kim 

AGU

Staff Partner; Program Coordinator, Section Awards and Lectures

Committee Charge

The committee is charged with selecting the recipients of the Emiliani Lecture. Committee members will abide by AGU’s Honors Conflict of Interest Policy, program policies, procedures and guidelines set by AGU. In partnership with the Honors and Recognition Committee and staff, the committee works to ensure that the program is superior in all respects, recognizes all constituents, and fosters a global network of individuals in the Earth and space sciences who epitomize excellence and cooperation in research, education, and outreach. The members of the Emiliani Lecture Committee will promote excellence and transparency, allowing broad input and recognition beyond disciplinary awards, promoting diversity and equity so that the lecture is sufficiently representative of underrepresented groups.

Iceberg with calm water and mountains

Key Duties

The Cesare Emiliani Lecture Committee supports the following initiatives and duties and serves a two-year term. Their work is completed primarily through the online submission and review system, and by teleconference and email.
  • 1
    Review data from honors selection processes for the past years to determine if the program is achieving AGU’s relevant goals
  • 2
    Examine and report on program data to determine whether the number and quality of lecture nominations is competitive
  • 3
    Select the Emiliani Lecture recipients
  • 4
    Recommend, implement, and evaluate strategies used to increase diversity of nominations
  • 5
    Participate in training, orientations, and workshops on associated Honors and Recognition policies and processes
  • 6
    Understand and commit to AGU’s Conflict of Interest policy and process
  • 7
    Provide input and recommendations to the Honors and Recognition Committee on program improvements
  • 8
    Partner with AGU leaders and staff, as well as other societies to resolve common issues among scientific communities’ recognition programs